Translation lookaside buffer for faster processing in response to availability of a first virtual address portion before a second virtual address portion

ABSTRACT

A processing system and method of operation are provided. First translation information is stored. A logic state of a first match line is selectively modified in response to a comparison between the first translation information and a first portion of a first address. Second translation information is stored. A logic state of a second match line is selectively modified in response to a comparison between the second translation information and a second portion of the first address. The logic state of the second match line is selectively modified in response to the logic state of the first match line. A second address is selectively output in response to the logic state of the second match line.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is related to coassigned copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/355,864, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,441, entitled "Content Addressable Memory Circuitry and Method of Operation", by Dietz et al., and to coassigned copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/355,874, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,189, entitled "Comparator Circuitry and Method of Operation", by Dietz et al., which are filed concurrently herewith and are hereby fully incorporated by reference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This patent application relates in general to information processing systems and in particular to a processing system and method of operation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various processing systems perform address translations. More particularly, a first address is translated into a second address. In connection with address translations, the first address is compared against translation information. Typical previous techniques fail to achieve faster address translations where a portion of the first address is available for comparison before another portion of the first address.

Thus, a need has arisen for a processing system and method of operation, in which faster address translations are achieved where a portion of the first address is available for comparison before another portion of the first address.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a processing system and method of operation, first translation information is stored. A logic state of a first match line is selectively modified in response to a comparison between the first translation information and a first portion of a first address. Second translation information is stored. A logic state of a second match line is selectively modified in response to a comparison between the second translation information and a second portion of the first address. The logic state of the second match line is selectively modified in response to the logic state of the first match line. A second address is selectively output in response to the logic state of the second match line.

It is a technical advantage of the present invention that faster address translations are achieved where the first portion of the first address is available for comparison before the second portion of the first address.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An illustrative embodiment of the present inventions and their advantages are better understood by referring to the following descriptions and accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system of the illustrative embodiment for processing information;

FIG. 2 is a conceptual illustration of a technique of the illustrative embodiment for translating a 32-bit effective address into its associated 32-bit real address;

FIG. 3 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of prior art content addressable memory ("CAM") circuitry;

FIGS. 4a-b are schematic electrical circuit diagrams of alternative versions of a representative CAM cell of the circuitry of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a first illustrative embodiment of cascadable CAM circuitry;

FIG. 6 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a second illustrative embodiment of cascadable CAM circuitry;

FIG. 7 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of prior art dynamic comparator circuitry;

FIG. 8 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a first illustrative embodiment of cascadable dynamic comparator circuitry; and

FIG. 9 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a second illustrative embodiment of cascadable dynamic comparator circuitry.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An illustrative embodiment of the present inventions and their advantages are better understood by referring to FIGS. 1-9 of the drawings, like alphanumeric characters being used for like and corresponding parts of the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a processor 10 system of the illustrative embodiment for processing information. In the illustrative embodiment, processor 10 is a single integrated circuit superscalar microprocessor. Accordingly, as discussed further hereinbelow, processor 10 includes various units, registers, buffers, memories, and other sections, all of which are formed by integrated circuitry, and all of which are interconnected as shown in FIG. 1. Also, in the illustrative embodiment, processor 10 operates according to reduced instruction set comprising ("RISC") techniques. As shown in FIG. 1, a system bus 11 is connected to a bus interface unit ("BIU") 12 of processor 10. BIU 12 controls the transfer of information between processor 10 and system bus 11.

BIU 12 is connected to a 4-kilobyte instruction cache/memory management unit ("MMU") 14 and to a 4-kilobyte data cache/MMU 16 of processor 10, as shown in FIG. 1. Instruction cache/MMU 14 outputs instructions to an instruction fetch/branch unit 18. In response to such instructions from instruction cache/MMU 14, instruction fetch/branch unit 18 selectively outputs instructions to other execution circuitry of processor 10.

In addition to instruction fetch/branch unit 18, in the illustrative embodiment the execution circuitry of processor 10 includes multiple execution units, namely a fixed point unit ("FXU") 22, a load/store unit ("LSU") 24 and a floating point unit ("FPU") 26. FXU 22 and LSU 24 input their source operand information from general purpose architectural registers ("GPRs")/rename buffers 28. FXU 22 and LSU 24 output results (destination operand information) of their operations for storage at selected rename buffers of GPRs/rename buffers 28.

FPU 26 inputs its source operand information from floating point architectural registers ("FPRs")/rename buffers 30. FPU 26 outputs results (destination operand information) of its operation for storage at selected rename buffers of FPRs/rename buffers 30.

In response to a Load instruction, LSU 24 inputs information from data cache/MMU 16 and copies such information to selected rename buffers of GPRs/rename buffers 28 and of FPRs/rename buffers 30. If such information is not stored in data cache/MMU 16, then data cache/MMU 16 inputs (through BIU 12 and system bus 11) such information from a system memory 39 connected to system bus 11. Moreover, data cache/MMU 16 is able to output (through BIU 12 and system bus 11) information from data cache/MMU 16 to system memory 39 connected to system bus 11. In response to a Store instruction, LSU 24 inputs information from a selected GPR (of GPRs/rename buffers 28) or FPR (of FPRs/rename buffers 30) and copies such information to data cache/MMU 16.

Instruction fetch/branch unit 18 inputs instructions and signals indicating a present state of processor 10. In response to such instructions and signals, instruction fetch/branch unit 18 computes suitable memory addresses which store a sequence of instructions for execution by processor 10. Instruction fetch/branch unit 18 inputs the indicated sequence of instructions from instruction cache/MMU 14. If one or more of the sequence of instructions is not stored in instruction cache/MMU 14, then instruction cache/MMU 14 inputs (through BIU 12 and system bus 11) such instructions from system memory 39 connected to system bus 11.

After inputting the instructions from instruction cache/MMU 14, instruction fetch/branch unit 18 outputs the instructions to a dispatch unit 20. After inputting the instructions from instruction fetch/branch unit 18, dispatch unit 20 selectively dispatches the instructions to selected ones of execution units 22, 24 and 26. Each execution unit executes one or more instructions of a particular class of instructions.

For example, FXU 22 executes a class of fixed class of fixed point mathematical operations on source operands, such as addition, subtraction, ANDing, ORing, XORing, and fixed point multiplication and division. Floating point unit ("FPU") 26 executes floating point operations on source operands, such as floating point multiplication and division.

In connection with the processing of an instruction, as destination operand information is stored at a selected rename buffer of GPRs/rename buffers 28, such information is associated with a respective GPR of GPRs/rename buffers 28 as specified by the instruction for which the selected rename buffer is allocated. At a writeback stage of the instruction's processing, information stored at the selected rename buffer is copied to its associated GPR.

Likewise, as destination operand information is stored at a selected rename buffer of FPRs/rename buffers 30, such information is associated with a respective FPR of FPRs/rename buffers 30. At the writeback stage of the instruction's processing, information stored at the selected rename buffer is copied to its associated FPR.

Processor 10 achieves high performance by processing multiple instructions simultaneously at various ones of execution units 22, 24 and 26. Accordingly, each instruction is processed as a sequence of stages, each being executable in parallel with stages of other instructions. Such a technique is called "pipelining".

In a significant aspect of the illustrative embodiment, an instruction is normally processed as a sequence of stages, namely fetch, decode, dispatch, execute, completion, and writeback. A completion unit 32 inputs signals indicating a present stage of processor 10. In response to such signals, completion unit 32 outputs suitable signals to dispatch unit 20 and to instruction fetch/branch unit 18 in order to process the completion stage of an instruction. Completion unit 32, dispatch unit 20, and instruction fetch/branch unit 18 operate in unison to process the instruction's completion stage by effecting various operations within processor 10, such as updating the status of various registers and flags within processor 10.

FIG. 2 is a conceptual illustration of a technique of the illustrative embodiment for translating a 32-bit effective address ("EA") into its associated 32-bit real (or physical) address ("RA"). As shown in FIG. 2, processor 10 translates the EA into its associated RA according to a two-step translation technique. In the first step, processor 10 translates the EA into its associated virtual address ("VA"). In the second step, processor 10 translates the VA into its associated RA. More particularly, for instruction addresses, instruction cache/MMU 14 of processor 10 translates the instruction EA into its associated RA. For operand addresses, data cache/MMU 16 of processor 10 translates the operand EA into its associated RA.

The EA's bits 2⁰ -2¹¹ form a Byte Index, the EA's bits 2¹² -2²⁷ form a Page Index, and the EA's bits 2²⁸ -2³¹ form a Segment Index.

As part of the first step in which processor 10 translates the EA into its associated VA, processor 10 forms the VA's bits 2⁰ -2¹¹ directly from the Byte Index, and processor 10 forms the VA's bits 2¹² -2²⁷ directly from the Page Index. Through a segment translation unit (i.e. through Segment Registers 100), processor 10 translates the Segment Index into its associated 24-bit Virtual Segment Identification ("VSID"). Then, processor 10 forms the VA's bits 2²⁸ -2⁵¹ directly from the VSID.

More particularly, each of the sixteen Segment Registers 100 stores an associated VSID. As part of the first step of translating the EA into its associated VA, processor 10 selects one of the sixteen Segment Registers 100 in response to the 4-bit Segment Index. The selected Segment Register outputs its associated VSID, and processor 10 forms the VA's bits 2²⁸ -2⁵¹ directly from this output VSID. Each of instruction cache/MMU 14 and data cache/MMU 16 includes a respective set of sixteen Segment Registers such as Segment Registers 100. In an alternative embodiment, processor 10 does not use Segment Registers 100 but instead translates the Segment Index into its associated 24-bit VSID using an alternative segment translation unit such as segment lookaside buffer.

As part of the second step in which processor 10 translates the VA into its associated RA, processor 10 forms the RA's bits 2⁰ -2¹¹ directly from the Byte Index. Through a translation lookaside buffer ("TLB") 102, processor 10 translates the 40-bit VSID/Page Index into an associated 20-bit Real Page Number ("RPN"). Then, processor 10 forms the RA's bits 2¹² -2³¹ directly from the RPN. Each of instruction cache/MMU 14 and data cache/MMU 16 includes a respective TLB such as TLB 102.

In the illustrative embodiment, TLB 102 is a fully associative TLB, such that TLB 102 achieves a higher hit rate than an alternative set associative TLB. The range of valid VAs is logically organized into blocks called "pages". Each page has a size between 1 kilobyte ("Kb") and 4 kilobytes. TLB 102 stores multiple page table entries ("PTEs") each for translating a 40-bit VSID/Page Index into its associated RPN. A PTE is one type of address translation information. Accordingly, each PTE includes a respective VSID/Page Index, together with the VSID/Page Index's associated RPN. In the illustrative embodiment, two PTEs do not include the same VSID/Page Index, but two PTEs can include the same RPN.

In the illustrative embodiment, numerous PTEs as stored in page tables in system memory 39. TLB 102 is a relatively small cache which stores the most-recently accessed PTEs from system memory 39. TLB 102 compares its stored PTEs against the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index. If one of the PTEs in TLB 102 matches the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, then TLB 102 outputs the matching PTE's associated RPN. If none of the PTEs in TLB 102 matches the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, then processor 10 searches the page tables in system memory 39 for the matching PTE; in such a situation, after processor 10 locates the matching PTE in system memory 39, processor 10 stores the matching PTE into TLB 102; if TLB 102 is full, then processor 10 stores the matching PTE in place of a least recently accessed PTE previously stored in TLB 102.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, TLB 102 inputs the Page Index portion of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index directly from the EA. By comparison, TLB 102 inputs the VSID portion of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index from Segment Registers 100. Accordingly, since time is used for translating the EA's Segment Index into its associated VSID through Segment Registers 100, TLB 102 inputs the Page Index portion (directly from the EA) earlier than the VSID portion (from Segment Registers 100).

Notably, the Page Index portion (which is available earlier than the VSID portion) is a less significant portion of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index than is the VSID portion. Similarly, in an alternative embodiment, TLB 102 inputs the VA from a 32-bit adder. Due to the 32-bit adder's carry chain, TLB 102 inputs the VA's least significant bits earlier than the VA's most significant bits.

FIG. 3 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of prior art content addressable memory ("CAM") circuitry, indicated generally at 298. In a TLB, CAM circuitry 298 can be used for storing the most-recently accessed PTEs from a system memory and for comparing the stored PTEs against a portion of a VA. Cam circuitry 298 includes two rows of CAM cells. More particularly, the first row includes CAM cells 302-d, 303a-d, and additional CAM cells which are not shown in FIG. 3 for clarity. The second row includes CAM cells 304a-d, 305a-d, and additional CAM cells which are not shown in FIG. 3 for clarity.

In the first row, CAM circuitry 298 is able to store a first PTE, such that each of CAM cells 302a-d and 303a-d (and each of the additional CAM cells of the first row) stores a respective bit of the first PTE. Similarly, in the second row, CAM circuitry 298 is able to store a second PTE, such that each of CAM cells 304a-d and 305a-d (and each of the additional CAM cells of the second row) stores a respective bit of the second PTE. Likewise, CAM circuitry 298 can include additional rows for storing additional PTEs.

In one embodiment, only the non-RPN portion of the first PTE is stored in the first row of CAM circuitry 298, while the RPN portion of the first PTE is stored in a respective row of random access memory ("RAM") cells (not shown in FIG. 3) connected to a match line MATCH0 of the first row of CAM circuitry 298. Similarly, in such an embodiment, only the non-RPN portion of the second PTE is stored in a respective row of CAM circuitry 298, while the RPN portion of the second PTE is stored in a respective row of RAM cells (not shown in FIG. 3) connected to a match line MATCH1 of the second row of CAM circuitry 298. Likewise, in such an embodiment, a respective row of RAM cells is connected to a respective match line of each additional row of CAM circuitry 298. Moreover, in such an embodiment, each particular row of CAM circuitry 298 includes a respective validity CAM cell for storing a valid bit; if a logic one state is stored in this validity CAM cell, then the particular row stores valid information.

As shown in FIG. 3, bit lines 300a-h and 301a-h are connected to the first and second rows of CAM circuitry 298. More particularly, the differential pair of bits lines 300a-b is connected to each of CAM cells 302a and 304a. Similarly, the differential pair of bit lines 300c-d is connected to each of CAM cells 302b and 304b. Also, the differential pair of bit lines 300e-f is connected to each of CAM cells 302c and 304c. Further, the differential pair of bit lines 300g-h is connected to each of CAM cells 302d and 304d.

Likewise, the differential pair of bit lines 301a-b is connected to each of CAM cells 303a and 305a. Moreover, the differential pair of bit lines 301c-d is connected to each of CAM cells 303b and 305b. In addition, the differential pair of bit lines 301e-f is connected to each of CAM cells 303c and 305c. Finally, the differential pair of bit lines 301g-h is connected to each of CAM cells 303d and 305d.

Information is read from a particular row of CAM circuitry 298 by selecting the particular row and reading differential logic signals representative of the information from the differential pairs of bit lines 300a-h and 301a-h. For example, the first row is selected by asserting word line WL0 to a logic one state and is deselected by clearing word line WL0 to a logic zero state. Likewise, the second row is selected by asserting a word line WL1 to a logic one state and is deselected by clearing word line WL1 to a logic zero state.

Information such as a PTE is stored into a particular row of CAM circuitry 298 by selecting the particular row and driving differential logic signals representative of the PTE through the differential pairs of bit lines 300a-h and 301a-h.

The stored PTEs are compared against a portion of a VA by deselecting all word lines (e.g. WL0 and WL1), precharging each differential pair of bit lines to a predetermined voltage state (e.g. a low-voltage state), precharging each of match lines MATCH0 and MATCH1 to a logic one state, and then driving differential logic signals representative of the one's complement of the portion of the VA through the differential pairs of bit lines. If the first row's stored PTE matches the portion of the VA, then the first row's connected match line MATCH0 remains charged to a logic one state. Similarly, if the second row's stored PTE matches the portion of the VA, then the second row's connected match line MATCH1 remains charged to a logic one state; otherwise, MATCH0 discharges to a logic zero state.

For clarity precharging circuitry is not shown in FIGS. 3-5. Analogous precharging circuitry is shown in FIGS. 7-9 discussed further hereinbelow.

In response to MATCH0 remaining charged to a logic one state, the TLB outputs the matching PTE's associated RPN from a respective row of RAM cells connected to MATCH0. In response to MATCH1 remaining charged to a logic one state, the TLB outputs the matching PTE's associated RPN from a respective row of RAM cells connected to MATCH1.

FIGS. 4a-b are schematic electrical circuit diagrams of alternative versions of representative CAM cell 302a of circuitry 298. CAM cell 302a is representative of the CAM cells of circuitry 298. In the examples of FIGS. 4a-b, a CAM cell includes a RAM cell together with dynamic comparator circuitry. The dynamic comparator circuitry is clocked, either by using a clocked enable signal (e.g. CAM₋₋ EN in FIG. 4a) or by clocking the delivery of information to bit lines (e.g. bit lines 310a-b in FIG. 4b).

Referring to FIG. 4a, a logic bit of information is read from CAM cell 302a by asserting word line WL0 to a logic one state and reading differential logic signals representative of the information from the differential pair of bit lines 300a and 300b. For example, if CAM cell 302a stores a logic one state, then asserting WL0 results in bit line 300a having a higher voltage level than bit line 300b, thereby representing the logic one state stored in CAM cell 302a. Similarly, if CAM cell 302a stores a logic zero state, then asserting WL0 results in bit line 300a having a lower voltage level than bit line 300b, thereby representing the logic zero state stored in CAM cell 302a.

A logic bit of information is stored into CAM cell 302a by asserting word line WL0 to a logic one state and driving differential logic signals representative of the information through the differential pair of bit lines 300a and 300b.

The stored logic bit of information is compared against a specified logic state by clearing word line WL0 to a logic zero state, precharging each of bit lines 300a and 300b to a low-voltage state, precharging match line MATCH0 to a logic one state, asserting enable line CAM₋₋ EN (not shown in FIG. 2 for clarity) to a logic one state, and then driving differential logic signals representative of the one's complement of the specified logic state through the differential pair of bit lines 300a and 300b.

For example, in order to compare the stored logic bit of information against a specified logic one state, differential logic signals representative of a logic zero state are driven through the differential pair of bit lines 300a and 300b, such that bit line 300a has a lower voltage level than bit line 300b. Similarly, in order to compare the stored logic bit of information against a specified logic zero state, differential logic signals representative of a logic one state are driven through the differential pair of bit lines 300a and 300b, such that bit line 300a has a higher voltage level than bit line 300b. If the stored logic bit of information matches the specified logic state, then match line MATCH0 remains charged to a logic one state; otherwise, MATCH0 discharges to a logic zero state.

Referring to FIG. 4b, an alternative version of CAM cell 302a is shown. In FIG. 4b, CAM cell 302a operates in the same manner as in FIG. 4a, except that:

(a) enable line CAM₋₋ EN is absent; and

(b) bit lines 310a and 310b (not shown in FIG. 2 for clarity) are used for a "compare" operation in place of bit lines 300a and 300b, respectively.

In FIG. 4b, bit lines 300a and 300b are used for "read" and "store" operations in the same manner as in FIG. 4a. By using the differential pair of bit lines 310a and 310b for a "compare" operation in place of bit lines 300a and 300b, CAM cell 302a (FIG. 4b) is advantageously capable of performing the "compare" operation concurrently with performing a "read" or "store" operation. Moreover, in FIG. 4b, bit lines 300a-b and 310a-b undergo less loading than bit lines 300a-b in FIG. 4a.

Referring again to FIG. 3, according to one example, a TLB includes CAM circuitry 298 of FIG. 3 is connection with implementing the address translation technique of FIG. 2. In such an example, CAM cells 303a-d input bits 2²⁴ through 2²⁷ (part of the Page Index portion) of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index directly from the EA. By comparison, CAM cells 302a-d input bits 2²⁸ through 2³¹ (part of the VSID portion) of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index from Segment Registers 100. As discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 2, since time is used for translating the EA's Segment Index into its associated VSID through Segment Registers 100, TLB 102 inputs the Page Index portion (directly from the EA) earlier than the VSID portion (from Segment Registers 100). Notably, the Page Index portion (which is available earlier than the VSID portion) is a less significant portion of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index than is the VSID portion.

Each of CAM cells 302a-d and 303a-d contributes additional diffusion loading to their shared connected match line MATCH0, resulting from each CAM cell's respective pulldown transistor(s) (e.g. field effect transistors 320a-b in FIG. 4a, and field effect transistors 322a-d in FIG. 4b) connected to MATCH0. Accordingly, as more CAM cells are connected to match line MATCH0, the match line's diffusion loading and RC (resistance-capacitance) delay are increased.

FIG. 5 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a first illustrative embodiment of cascadable CAM circuitry, indicated generally at 500. In the illustrative embodiment, the respective TLB (such as TLB 102) in each of instruction cache/MMU 14 and data cache/MMU 16 includes CAM circuitry 500 which is improved over CAM circuitry 298 of FIG. 3. By including CAM circuitry 500 instead of CAM circuitry 298, the fully associative TLBs of the illustrative embodiment more quickly translate an EA into its associated RA.

In the example of FIG. 5, CAM circuitry 500 includes two identical cascadable stages, namely CAM Stage Zero (indicated by dashed enclosure 502) and CAM Stage One (indicated by dashed enclosure 504). More particularly, CAM Stage Zero 502 includes CAM cells 303a-d and 305a-d; these CAM cells are connected to bit lines 301a-h as shown in FIG. 5 and in the same manner as discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 3. CAM Stage One 504 includes CAM cells 302a-d and 304a-d; these CAM cells are connected to bit lines 300a-h as shown in FIG. 5 and in the same manner as discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 3.

In the example of FIG. 5, CAM Stage Zero 502 includes a Row-0 CAM Stage Zero-A 506a and a Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-A 506b. More particularly, Row-0 CAM Stage Zero-A 506a includes CAM cells 303a-d. By comparison, Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-A 506b includes CAM cells 305a-d.

Although only two cascadable stages (i.e. CAM Stage Zero 502 and CAM Stage One 504) are shown in FIG. 5, any number of additional stages can be included in circuitry 500. Each stage (except the last stage) is connected directly into a subsequent stage in the manner shown in FIG. 5, where CAM Stage Zero 502 is connected directly into subsequent stage CAM Stage One 504. In this manner, with the technique of the illustrative embodiment, large CAM circuitry is physically organized into a sequence of smaller cascadable stages, with each stage having its own respective match line (and its own respective circuitry for precharging such match line). Since each identical stage is cascadable, it advantageously is useful as a standard cell component within a circuit library.

For example, as shown in FIG. 5, Row-0 CAM Stage Zero-A 506a has a respective match line 510a, and Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-A 506b has a respective match line 510b. Advantageously, each of match line 510a and MATCH₋₋ OUT0 (FIG. 5) has less diffusion loading and less RC delay than MATCH0 (FIG. 3). This is because each of match line 510a and MATCH₋₋ OUT0 (FIG. 5) is shorter (and has fewer connected CAM cells) than MATCH0 (FIG. 3), and the diffusion loading of match line 510a is electrically isolated from the diffusion loading of MATCH₋₋ OUT0 by an inverter 512a and a pulldown n-channel field effect transistor 514a. Likewise, the diffusion loading of match line 510b is electrically isolated from the diffusion loading of MATCH₋₋ OUT1 by an inverter 512b and a pulldown n-channel field effect transistor 514b.

Accordingly, the diffusion loading and RC delay on MATCH₋₋ OUT0 and MATCH₋₋ OUT1 (FIG. 5) are reduced in comparison to the diffusion loading and RC delay on MATCH0 and MATCH1 (FIG. 3). The reduced diffusion loading and reduced RC delay enables each of CAM Stage Zero 502 and CAM Stage One 504 to achieve faster output edge rates than CAM circuitry 298, thereby speeding and improving the drive time of each of match lines 510a-b, MATCH.₋₋ OUT0 and MATCH₋₋ OUT1 (FIG. 5) relative to MATCH0 and MATCH 1 (FIG. 3).

Moreover, in CAM circuitry 500, each CAM cell has smaller devices than in CAM circuitry 298, thereby achieving smaller layout area within integrated circuitry. Each CAM cell's respective pulldown transistor(s) (e.g. field effect transistors 320a-b in FIG. 4a, and field effect transistors 322a-d in FIG. 4b) are smaller without sacrificing speed.

Individually, each of CAM Stage Zero 502 and CAM Stage One 504 has less diffusion loading and less RC delay and is therefore faster than circuitry 298. For a "compare" operation, if CAM circuitry 500 inputs a first portion of the to-be-compared information earlier than a second portion of the to-be-compared information, then CAM circuitry 500 performs the "compare" operation significantly faster than CAM circuitry 298. If CAM circuitry 500 inputs all of the to-be-compared information at substantially the same moment, then the significance of such improvement in speed is diminished.

Nevertheless, in the illustrative embodiment as discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 2, since time is used for translating the EA's Segment Index into its associated VSID through Segment Registers 100, TLB 102 inputs the least significant Page Index portion (directly from the EA) earlier than the more significant VSID portion (from Segment Registers 100). In the present example, CAM cells 303a-d input bits 2⁰ through 2³ (part of the Page Index portion) of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index directly from the EA. By comparison, CAM cells 302a-d input bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ (part of the VSID portion) of the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index from Segment Registers 100. Thus, sequential CAM cells 303d and 302a input non-sequential bits 2⁰ and 2³⁹, respectively, of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index.

Notably, CAM cells 302a-d are in CAM Stage One 504 rather than in CAM Stage Zero 502. Likewise, CAM cells 303a-d are in CAM Stage Zero 502 rather than in CAM Stage One 504. Accordingly, in terms of the bit significance order within the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ are input by CAM circuitry 500 out of order relative to the set of bits 2⁰ through 2³.

However, in terms of the time order in which TLB 102 inputs the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ are input by CAM circuitry 500 in order relative to the set of bits 2⁰ through 2³. This is because the set of bits 2⁰ through 2³ (part of the less significant Page Index portion input by CAM circuitry 500 directly from the EA) are input by CAM circuitry 500 earlier than the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ (part of the more significant VSID portion input by CAM circuitry 500 from Segment Registers 100).

Accordingly, by CAM cells 303a-d inputting bits 2⁰ through 2³, and by CAM cells 302a-d inputting bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹, CAM Stage Zero 502 is the early non-critical stage, and CAM Stage One 504 is the later critical stage. Thus, according to the cascadable CAM-based TLB technique of the illustrative embodiment, the early non-critical stage is more electrically isolated from the later critical stage when compared to conventional techniques.

Since information arrives at the early non-critical stage before the late critical stage, the isolation of diffusion loading and the smaller RC delay of CAM circuitry 500 allows the late critical CAM Stage One 504 (FIG. 5) to have a significantly faster response time than CAM circuitry 298 (FIG. 3). This response time is measured from the arrival of information through bit lines 300a-h until validity of the signal on the match line; the match line is MATCH₋₋ OUT0 for CAM Stage One 504 and is MATCH0 for CAM circuitry 298.

With the improved technique of FIG. 5, it is estimated that the match line (MATCH₋₋ OUT0) loading of the critical stage (CAM Stage One 504) is reduced by approximately 41% relative to the conventional technique of FIG. 3. Accordingly, in CAM Stage One 504 of the illustrative embodiment, each CAM cell's (302a-d) respective pulldown transistor(s) (e.g. field effect transistors 320a-b in FIG. 4a, and field effect transistors 322a-d in FIG. 4b) operate substantially faster than in FIG. 3. Alternatively, if silicon layout area is a more critical factor than speed, each CAM cell's respective pulldown transistor(s) can be advantageously 41% smaller than in FIG. 3.

Moreover, since the gate loading of each CAM cell's respective pulldown transistor(s) affect bit lines 300a-h, smaller pulldown transistor(s) advantageously result in less loading on bit lines 300a-h, thereby further increasing speed of CAM circuitry 500 (FIG. 5) relative to CAM circuitry 298 (FIG. 3). Further, it is estimated that the match line (510a) loading of the non-critical stage (CAM Stage Zero 502) is reduced by approximately 58% relative to the conventional technique of FIG. 3. All this is at least partly attributable to the fact that, in the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 5, the single common match line MATCH0 (FIG. 3) is replaced by multiple match lines 510a and MATCH₋₋ OUT0 (FIG. 5) each having less diffusion loading and RC delay than MATCH0.

Accordingly, the cascadable CAM-based TLB of the illustrative embodiment is both faster and smaller than a conventional CAM-based TLB. If a portion of the TLB compare data arrives earlier than another portion of the TLB compare data, the technique of the illustrative embodiment is significantly faster than a conventional CAM-based TLB technique.

Advantageously, the cascadable CAM-based TLB technique of the illustrative embodiment can be implemented with either type of CAM cell shown in FIGS. 4a-b. Moreover, CAM circuitry 500 can include more than one type of CAM cell. In one example embodiment, each of CAM cells 303a-d and 305a-d in CAM Stage Zero 502 is designed as shown in FIG. 4a., and each of CAM cells 302a-d and 304a-d is designed as shown in FIG. 4b. In such an example embodiment, each CAM cell in CAM Stage Zero 502 is selectively enabled in response to a signal on CAM₋₋ EN (FIG. 4a).

A source of an n-channel field effect transistor 516a is connected to a voltage reference node Vss. A drain of transistor 516a is connected to a source of an n-channel field effect transistor 514a. A drain of transistor 514a is connected to MATCH₋₋ OUT0.

Referring to FIG. 5, in operation, transistor 516a (in Row-0 of CAM Stage One 504) operates as an "enable" device for Row-0 CAM Stage Zero-A 506a. Likewise, a transistor 516b (in Row 2 of CAM Stage One 504) operates as an "enable" device for Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-A 506b (in response to a logic state of EN1A). If EN0A (connected to the gate of transistor 516a) is a logic one state, then transistor 516a is turned on; otherwise, transistor 516a is turned off. If transistor 516a is turned off, then preceding CAM Stage Zero 502 is "disabled", such that match line MATCH₋₋ OUT0 is controlled solely by CAM Stage One 504 without regard to CAM Stage Zero 502 or to the state of match line 510a. In that situation, any of CAM cells 302a-d is able to discharge match line MATCH₋₋ OUT0.

By comparison, if transistor 516a is turned on, then preceding CAM Stage Zero 502 is "enabled", such that match line MATCH₋₋ OUT0 is controlled by CAM Stage One 504 and by CAM Stage Zero 502. Accordingly, if transistor 516a is turned on, and if any of CAM cells 303a-d discharges match line 510a, then the output of inverter 512a is a logic one state so that transistor 514a is turned on (because the output of inverter 512a is connected to the gate of transistor 514a). If both transistors 514a and 516a are turned on, then circuitry 500 discharges match line MATCH₋₋ OUT0.

Accordingly, transistor 516a selectively enables CAM Stage Zero 502. For a "compare" operation involving information stored in CAM cells 302a-d (but not CAM cells 303a-d), processor 10 clears EN0A to a logic zero stage. By comparison, for a "compare" operation involving information stored in CAM cells 302a-d and 303a-d, processor 10 sets EN0A to a logic one state; moreover, by selectively setting EN0A to a logic one state at a suitable moment, processor 10 is able to coordinate the timing of "compare" operations to be different between CAM Stage Zero 502 and CAM Stage One 504.

In the examples of FIGS. 4a-b, a CAM cell includes a RAM cell together with dynamic comparator circuitry. The dynamic comparator circuitry is clocked, either by using a clocked enable signal (e.g. CAM₋₋ EN in FIG. 4a) or by clocking the delivery of information to bit lines (e.g. bit lines 310a-b in FIG. 4b). Since the dynamic comparator circuitry is clocked, the interface (e.g. inverter 512a and transistor 514a) between cascadably connected CAM stages (e.g. CAM Stage Zero 502 and CAM Stage One 504) does not need to be clocked. In this manner, the interface between the cascadably connected CAM stages is advantageously streamlined.

FIG. 6 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a second illustrative embodiment of cascadable CAM circuitry 500. More particularly, FIG. 6 shows cascadable CAM circuitry 500 with parallel stages. In FIG. 6, Row-0 of CAM circuitry 500 includes identical parallel stages Row-0 CAM Stage Zero-A 506a and Row-0 Cam Stage Zero-B 507a. Also, Row-0 of CAM circuitry 500 includes a subsequent stage Row-0 CAM Stage One including CAM cells 302a-d and pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 514a and 517a. Transistor 517a operates relative to CAM Stage 507a in the same manner as transistor 514a operates relative to CAM Stage 506a.

Further, in FIG. 6, Row-1 of CAM circuitry 500 includes identical parallel stages Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-A 506b and Row-1 CAM Stage Zero-B 507b. Also, Row-1 of CAM circuitry 500 includes a subsequent stage Row-1 CAM Stage One including CAM cells 304a-d and pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 514b and 517b. Transistor 517b operates relative to CAM Stage 507b in the same manner as transistor 514b operates relative to CAM Stage 506b.

For clarity, FIG. 6 does not show bit lines 301a-h or analogous bit lines connected to CAM stages 507a-b; nevertheless, such analogous bit lines are included in the second illustrative embodiment (FIG. 6) of CAM circuitry 500. The second illustrative embodiment (FIG. 6) of CAM circuitry 500 does not include optional transistors 516a-b or analogous pulldown n-channel field effect transistors which optionally could be included in CAM circuitry 500 as "enable" devices for CAM stages 507a-b. Such optional "enable" devices are discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 5.

According to the second illustrative embodiment (FIG. 6) of CAM circuitry 500, the subsequent CAM Stage One 504 of CAM circuitry 500 inputs signals from multiple previous stages 502 and 503 in parallel. Accordingly, any of transistors 514a and 517a is operable to discharge MATCH₋₋ OUT0 independently of one another. In this manner, a three-or-more-stage cascadable CAM (such as the second illustrative embodiment of CAM circuitry 500 shown in FIG. 6) achieves the speed of a two-stage cascadable CAM (such as the first illustrative embodiment of CAM circuitry 500 shown in FIG. 5).

The second illustrative embodiment of CAM circuitry 500 shown in FIG. 6 is particularly advantageous for large CAM circuitry, where parallel stages of CAM cells (e.g. CAM stages 502 and 503) are formed by left and right sides, respectively, of an array of CAM cells; the parallel stages directly output respective signals (e.g. to transistors 514a and 517a, respectively) into a final center stage (e.g. CAM stage 504). In this manner, semiconductor area is advantageously decreased because routing of match lines is decreased; all match lines can be routed co-linearly through a single horizontal channel of the semiconductor without forming lengthwise adjacent match lines. This technique of the second illustrative embodiment further reduces RC delays of CAM circuitry 500.

Notably, MATCH₋₋ OUT0 is further connectable to yet an additional subsequent CAM stage (not shown but identical in logical design to cascadable CAM Stage 506a) through the input transistor (not shown but identical in logical design to transistor 514a) of such a subsequent CAM stage. In that manner, the techniques of the first (FIG. 5) and second (FIG. 6) illustrative embodiments of CAM circuitry 500 are combined, such that CAM stages 506a and 507a of FIG. 6 output their respective match line signals in a parallel fashion to center CAM stage 504 of FIG. 6, while center CAM stage 504 further outputs its match line signal in a sequential fashion to the additional subsequent CAM stage.

FIG. 7 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of prior art dynamic comparator circuitry, indicated generally at 700. Comparator circuitry 700 includes a row of XOR cells 702-d, 704a-d, and additional XOR cells which are not shown in FIG. 7 for clarity. As shown in FIG. 7, comparator circuitry 700 is able to compare bits A0-A7 against bits B0-B7, respectively. Together, bits A0-A7 form a byte A, and bits B0-B7 form a byte B.

Accordingly, comparator circuitry 700 is able to compare a first byte A against a second byte B. Together bytes A and B form a byte pair. Likewise, comparator circuitry 700 can include additional rows for comparing additional byte pairs.

As shown in FIG. 7, either dynamic XOR cells or static XOR cells, or both, can be used for comparator circuitry 700. Outputs of dynamic XOR cells 702a-d are respectively connected to gates of pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 706a-d. Outputs of static XOR cells 704a-d are respectively connected to gates of pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 708a-d.

Sources of transistors 706a-d are connected to voltage reference node Vss. Drains of transistors 706a-d are connected to match line MATCH of FIG. 7. Moreover, a clock signal CLK is connected to gates of pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 710a-d.

Sources of transistors 710a-d are connected to voltage reference node Vss. Drains of transistors 710a-d are respectively connected to sources of transistors 708a-d. Drains of transistors 708a-d are connected to match line MATCH of FIG. 7.

Dynamic XOR cell 702a is a representative one of dynamic XOR cells 702a-d. Dynamic XOR cell 702a compares bit A0 against bit B0. If A0=B0 (i.e. bits A0 and B0 each have a logic one state, or bits A0 and B0 each have a logic zero stage), then transistor 706a is turned off; otherwise, transistor 706a is turned on. If transistor 706a is turned off, then match line MATCH of FIG. 7 remains charged to a logic one state; by comparison, if transistor 706a is turned on, then match line MATCH of FIG. 7 discharges to a logic zero state.

Static XOR cell 704a is a representative one of static XOR cells 704a-d. Static XOR cell 704a compares bit A4 against bit B4. If A4=B4 (i.e. bits A4 and B4 each have a logic one state, or bits A4 and B4 each have a logic zero state), then transistor 708a is turned off; otherwise, transistor 708a is turned on. If transistor 708a is turned off, then match line MATCH of FIG. 7 remains charged to a logic one state; by comparison, if transistor 708a is turned on, then match line MATCH of FIG. 7 discharges to a logic zero state in response to clock signal CLK having a logic one state.

This responsiveness to clock signal CLK is important in connection with static XOR cells 704a-d, because the discharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7 would not otherwise be timed relative to the precharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7. This is because the outputs of static XOR cells 704a-d are not timed relative to the precharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7. By comparison, the outputs of dynamic XOR cells 702a-d are timed relative to the precharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7, because XOR cells 702a-d are dynamic; accordingly, clock signal CLK is not used in connection with dynamic XOR cells 702a-d.

In operation, match line MATCH of FIG. 7 is precharged to a logic one state by clearing PRECHARGE to a logic zero state. More particularly, by clearing PRECHARGE to a logic zero state, a p-channel field effect transistor 712 is turned on. This results in precharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7, because a gate of transistor 712 is connected to PRECHARGE, a source of transistor 712 is connected to a voltage supply node Vdd, and a drain of transistor 712 is connected to match line MATCH of FIG. 7.

After precharging match line MATCH of FIG. 7, if A0=B0, A1=B1, A2=B2, A3=B3, A4=B4, A5=B5, A6=B6 and A7=B7, then match line MATCH of FIG. 7 remains charged to a logic one state; otherwise, match line MATCH of FIG. 7 discharges to a logic zero state at a suitable moment after the precharging of match line MATCH of FIG. 7.

FIG. 8 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a first illustrative embodiment of cascadable dynamic comparator circuitry, indicated generally at 800. In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 2 discussed further hereinabove, TLB 102 (FIG. 2) is a fully associative TLB including CAM circuitry 500 of FIG. 5. In an alternative embodiment of FIG. 2, TLB 102 (FIG. 2) is a set associative TLB including comparator circuitry 800 of FIG. 8.

According to such an alternative embodiment, TLB 102 selects multiple 20-bit RPNs (and tags respectively associated with these selected 20-bit RPNs) in response to a first portion (e.g. the least significant four bits) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index. For example, if TLB 102 is a 2-way set associative TLB, then TLB 102 selects two RPNs (and their respectively associated tags) in response to the first portion of the VSID/Page Index.

In this alternative embodiment, TLB 102 uses comparator circuitry 800 to further select one of the selected 20-bit RPNs in response to a second portion (e.g. the most significant 36 bits) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index. This second portion includes any portion of the VSID/Page Index which is not part of the first portion. More particularly, comparator circuitry 800 compares the second portion against the tags respectively associated with the selected 20-bit RPNs.

According to one example, a 2-way set associative TLB 102 selects two 20-bit RPNs (and two 36-bit tags respectively associated with these selected 20-bit RPNs) in response to the least significant four bits of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index. Comparator circuitry 800 compares each of the 36-bit tags against the most significant 36 bits of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index. If TLB 102 included comparator circuitry 700 (FIG. 7) instead of comparator circuitry 800, XOR cells 702a-d would compare bits 2¹⁶ through 2¹⁹ of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2¹² through 2¹⁵ of a predetermined one of the 36-bit tags. Further, with comparator circuitry 700, XOR cells 704a-d would compare bits 2¹² through 2¹⁵ of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2⁸ through 2¹¹ of the predetermined 36-bit tag.

In contrast, by TLB 102 including comparator circuitry 800 instead of comparator circuitry 700, XOR cells 702a-d compare bits 2⁴ through 2⁷ (part of the Page Index portion) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2⁰ through 2³ of the predetermined 36-bit tag. Further, with comparator circuitry 800, XOR cells 704a-d compare bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ (part of the VSID portion) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2³² through 2³⁵ of the predetermined 36-bit tag.

As discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 2, since time is used for translating the EA's Segment Index into its associated VSID through Segment Registers 100, TLB 102 inputs the Page Index portion (directly from the EA) earlier than the VSID portion (from Segment Registers 100). Notably, the Page Index portion (which is available earlier than the VSID portion) is a less significant portion of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index than is the VSID portion.

In FIG. 7, each of XOR cells 702a-d and 704a-d contributes additional diffusion loading to their shared connected match line MATCH, resulting from each XOR cell's associated pulldown transistor(s) (e.g. field effect transistors 706a-d, 708a-d and 710a-d) coupled to MATCH0. Accordingly, as more XOR cells are connected to match line MATCH, the match line's diffusion loading and RC (resistance-capacitance) delay are increased.

Comparator circuitry 800 is improved over comparator circuitry 700. By including comparator circuitry 800 instead of comparator circuitry 700, a set associative TLB more quickly translates an EA into its associated RA.

Comparator circuitry 800 includes two identical cascadable stages, namely Compare Stage Zero (indicated by dashed enclosure 802) and Compare Stage One (indicated by dashed enclosure 804). More particularly, Compare Stage Zero 802 includes XOR cells 702a-d. Compare Stage One 804 includes XOR cells 704a-d.

Although only two cascadable stages (i.e. Compare Stage Zero 802 and Compare Stage One 804) are shown in FIG. 8, any number of additional stages can be included in circuitry 800. Each stage (except the last stage) is connected directly into a subsequent stage in the manner shown in FIG. 8, where Compare Stage Zero 802 is connected directly into subsequent stage Compare Stage One 804. In this manner, large comparator circuitry is physically organized into a sequence of smaller cascadable stages, with each stage having its own respective match line (and its own respective circuitry for precharging such match line).

For example, as shown in FIG. 8, Compare Stage Zero 802 has a respective match line 810, and Compare Stage One 804 has a respective match line MATCH₋₋ OUT. Advantageously, each of match line 810 and MATCH₋₋ OUT has less diffusion loading and less RC delay than MATCH of FIG. 7. This is because each of match line 810 and MATCH₋₋ OUT is shorter (as has fewer connected XOR cells) than MATCH of FIG. 7, and the diffusion loading of match line 810 is electrically isolated from the diffusion loading of MATCH₋₋ OUT by an inverter 812 and a pulldown n-channel field effect transistor 814.

Accordingly, the diffusion loading and RC delay on MATCH₋₋ OUT is reduced in comparison to the diffusion loading and RC delay on MATCH of FIG. 7. The reduced diffusion loading and reduced RC delay enables each of Compare Stage Zero 802 and Compare Stage One 804 to achieve faster output edge rates than comparator circuitry 700 (FIG. 7), thereby speeding and improving the drive time of each of match lines 810 and MATCH.₋₋ OUT relative to MATCH of FIG. 7.

Moreover, in comparator circuitry 800, pulldown transistors (e.g. field effect transistors 706a-d, 708a-d and 710a-d) are smaller without sacrificing speed, thereby achieving smaller layout area within integrated circuitry.

Individually, each of Compare Stage Zero 802 and Compare Stage One 804 has less diffusion loading and less RC delay and is therefore faster than circuitry 700 (FIG. 7). For a "compare" operation, if comparator circuitry 800 inputs a first portion of the to-be-compared information earlier than a second portion of the to-be-compared information, then comparator circuitry 800 performs the "compare" operation significantly faster than comparator circuitry 700. If comparator circuitry 800 inputs all of the to-be-compared information at substantially the same moment, then the significance of such improvement in speed is diminished.

Nevertheless, in the example discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 2, since time is used for translating the EA's Segment Index into its associated VSID through Segment Registers 100, TLB 102 inputs the least significant Page Index portion (directly from the EA) earlier than the more significant VSID portion (from Segment Registers 100).

By a set associative TLB 102 including comparator circuitry 800 instead of comparator circuitry 700, XOR cells 702a-d compare bits 2⁴ through 2⁷ (part of the Page Index portion) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2⁰ through 2³ of the predetermined 36-bit tag. Further, with comparator circuitry 800, XOR cells 704a-d compare bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ (part of the VSID portion) of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index against bits 2³² through 2³⁵ of the predetermined 36-bit tag. Thus, sequential XOR cells 702d and 704a input non-sequential bits 2⁴ and 2³⁹, respectively, of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index.

Notably, XOR cells 702a-d are in Compare Stage Zero 802. Further, XOR cells 704a-d are in Compare Stage One 804. Accordingly, in terms of the bit significance order within the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index are input by comparator circuitry 800 out of order relative to the set of bits 2⁴ through 2⁷ of the 40-bit VSID/Page Index.

However, in terms of the time order in which TLB 102 inputs the VA's 40-bit VSID/Page Index, the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ are input by comparator circuitry 800 in order relative to the set of bits 2⁴ through 2⁷. This is because the set of bits 2⁴ through 2⁷ (part of the less significant Page Index portion input by comparator circuitry 800 directly from the EA) are input by comparator circuitry 800 earlier than the set of bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹ (part of the more significant VSID portion input by comparator circuitry 800 from Segment Register 100).

Accordingly, by XOR cells 702a-d inputting bits 2⁴ through 2⁷, and by XOR cells 704a-d inputting bits 2³⁶ through 2³⁹, Compare Stage Zero 802 is the early non-critical stage, and Compare Stage One 804 is the late critical stage. Thus, according to the cascadable comparator-based TLB technique of this example, the early non-critical stage is more electrically isolated from the late critical stage when compared to conventional techniques.

Since information arrives at the early non-critical stage before the late critical stage, the isolation of diffusion loading and the smaller RC delay of comparator circuitry 800 allows the late critical Compare Stage One 804 (FIG. 8) to have a significantly faster response time than comparator circuitry 700 (FIG. 7). This response time is measured from the arrival of all bits A0-A7 and B0-B7 until validity of the signal on the match line; the match line is MATCH₋₋ OUT for Compare Stage One 804 and is MATCH for comparator circuitry 700.

With the improved technique of FIG. 8, it is estimated that the match line (MATCH₋₋ OUT) loading of the critical stage (Compare Stage One 804) is reduced substantially relative to the conventional technique of FIG. 7. Accordingly, in Compare Stage One 804 of FIG. 8, pulldown transistors (e.g. field effect transistors 706a-d, 708a-d and 710a-d) operate substantially faster than in FIG. 7. Alternatively, if silicon layout area is a more critical factor than speed, pulldown transistors can be advantageously smaller than in FIG. 7.

Further, it is estimated that the match line (810) loading of the non-critical stage (Compare Stage Zero 802) is reduced substantially relative to the conventional technique of FIG. 7. All this is at least partly attributable to the fact that, in the example of FIG. 8, the single common match line MATCH (FIG. 7) is replaced by multiple match lines 810 and MATCH₋₋ OUT (FIG. 8) each having less diffusion loading and RC delay than MATCH (FIG. 7).

Accordingly, the cascadable comparator-based TLB of the example of FIG. 8 is both faster and smaller than a conventional comparator-based TLB. If a portion of the TLB compare data arrives earlier than another portion of the TLB compare data, the technique of FIG. 8 is significantly faster than a conventional comparator-based TLB technique.

A source of an n-channel field effect transistor 816 is connected to a voltage reference node Vss. A drain of transistor 816 is connected to a source of n-channel field effect transistor 814. A drain of transistor 814 is connected to MATCH₋₋ OUT.

Referring to FIG. 8, in operation, transistor 816 (in Compare Stage One 804) operates as an "enable" device for Compare Stage Zero 806. If ENABLE (connected to the gate of transistor 816) is a logic one state, then transistor 816 is turned on; otherwise, transistor 816 is turned off. If transistor 816 is turned off, then preceding Compare Stage Zero 802 is "disabled", such that match line MATCH₋₋ OUT is controlled solely by Compare Stage One 804 without regard to Compare Stage Zero 802 or to the state of match line 810. In that situation, any of XOR cells 704a-d is able to discharge match line MATCH₋₋ OUT.

By comparison, if transistor 816 is turned on, then preceding Compare Stage Zero 802 is "enabled", such that match line MATCH₋₋ OUT is controlled by Compare Stage One 804 and by Compare Stage Zero 802. Accordingly, if transistor 816 is turned on, and if any of XOR cells 702a-d discharges match line 810, then the output of inverter 812 is a logic one state so that transistor 814 is turned on (because the output of inverter 812 is connected to the gate of transistor 814). If both transistors 814 and 816 are turned on, then circuitry 800 discharges match line MATCH₋₋ OUT.

Accordingly, transistor 816 selectively enables Compare Stage Zero 802. For a "compare" operation involving information input by XOR cells 704a-d (but not XOR cells 702a-d), processor 10 clears ENABLE to a logic zero state. By comparison, for a "compare" operation involving information input by XOR cells 702a-d and 704a-d, processor 10 sets ENABLE to a logic one state; moreover, by selectively setting ENABLE to a logic one state at a suitable moment, processor 10 is able to coordinate the timing of "compare" operations to be different between Compare Stage Zero 802 and Compare Stage One 804.

Since the XOR cells are either dynamic (and accordingly clocked) or static (and accordingly operated in combination with clock signal CLK as shown in FIG. 8), the interface (e.g. inverter 812 and transistor 814) between cascadably connected compare stages (e.g. Compare Stage Zero 802 and Compare Stage One 804) does not need to be clocked. In this manner, the interface between the cascadably connected compare stages is advantageously streamlined.

Notably, XOR cells 702a-d are dynamic, and XOR cells 704a-d are static. Nevertheless, in an alternative embodiment of comparator circuitry 800, all XOR cells are dynamic and connected to their associated match lines in the same manner as XOR cells 702a-d are connected to match line 810. In yet another alternative embodiment of comparator circuitry 800, all XOR cells are static and connected to their associated match lines in the same manner as XOR cells 704a-d are connected to match line MATCH₋₋ OUT.

FIG. 9 is a schematic electrical circuit diagram of a second illustrative embodiment of cascadable dynamic comparator circuitry 800. More particularly, FIG. 9 shows cascadable comparator circuitry 800 with parallel stages. In FIG. 9, comparator circuitry 800 includes identical parallel stages Compare Stage Zero-A 802 (identical to Compare Stage Zero 802 of FIG. 8) and Compare Stage Zero-B 803 (identical in logical design to Compare Stage Zero 802 of FIG. 8). Also, comparator circuitry 800 includes a subsequent stage Compare Stage One 804 including XOR cells 704a-d and pulldown n-channel field effect transistors 814 and 817. Transistor 817 operates relative to Compare Stage 803 in the same manner as transistor 814 operates relative to Compare Stage 802.

The second illustrative embodiment (FIG. 9) of comparator circuitry 800 does not include optional transistor 816 or an analogous pulldown n-channel field effect transistor which optionally could be included in comparator circuitry 800 as an "enable" device for Compare Stage 803. Such optional "enable" devices are discussed further hereinabove in connection with FIG. 8.

According to the second illustrative embodiment (FIG. 9) of comparator circuitry 800, the subsequent Compare Stage One 804 of comparator circuitry 800 inputs signals from multiple previous stages 802 and 803 in parallel. Accordingly, any of transistors 814 and 817 is operable to discharge MATCH₋₋ OUT independently of one another. In this manner, a three-or-more-stage cascadable comparator (such as the second illustrative embodiment of comparator circuitry 800 shown in FIG. 9) achieves the speed of a two-stage cascadable comparator (such as the first illustrative embodiment of comparator circuitry 800 shown in FIG. 8).

The second illustrative embodiment of comparator circuitry 800 shown in FIG. 9 is particularly advantageous for large comparator circuitry, where parallel stages of XOR cells (e.g. Compare Stages 802 and 803) are formed by left and right sides, respectively, of an array of XOR cells; the parallel stages directly output respective signals (e.g. to transistors 814 and 817, respectively) into a final center stage (e.g. Compare Stage 804). In this manner, semiconductor area is advantageously decreased because routing of match lines is decreased; all match lines can be routed co-linearly through a single horizontal channel of the semiconductor without forming lengthwise adjacent match lines. This technique of the second illustrative embodiment further reduces RC delays of comparator circuitry 800.

Notably, MATCH₋₋ OUT is further connectable to yet an additional subsequent Compare Stage (not shown but identical in logical design to cascadable Compare Stage 802) through the input transistor (not shown but identical in logical design to transistor 814) of such a subsequent Compare Stage. In that manner, the techniques of the first (FIG. 8) and second (FIG. 9) illustrative embodiments of comparator circuitry 800 are combined, such that Compare Stages 802 and 803 of FIG. 9 output their respective match line signals in a parallel fashion to center Compare Stage 804 of FIG. 9, while center Compare Stage 804 further outputs its match line signal in a sequential fashion to the additional subsequent Compare Stage.

Although an illustrative embodiment of the present inventions and their advantages have been described in detail hereinabove, it has been described as example and not as limitation. Various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made in the illustrative embodiment without departing from the breadth, scope and spirit of the present inventions. The breadth, scope and spirit of the present inventions should not be limited by the illustrative embodiment, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and equivalents thereof. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A processing system, comprising:first circuitry for storing first translation information and selectively modifying a logic state of a first match line in response to a comparison between said first translation information and a first portion of a first address; second circuitry for storing second translation information and selectively modifying a logic state of a second match line in response to a comparison between said second translation information and a second portion of said first address; third circuitry for selectively modifying said logic state of said second match line in response to said logic state of said first match line; and fourth circuitry for selectively outputting a second address in response to said logic state of said second match line.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein said first portion of said first address is available for said comparison before said second portion of said first address.
 3. The system of claim 1 and further comprising a translation unit for translating at least a portion of an effective address into said second portion of said first address.
 4. The system of claim 3 wherein said second portion of said first address is available from said translation unit, and wherein said first portion of said first address is available from said effective address without translation.
 5. The system of claim 1 wherein said first address is a virtual address.
 6. The system of claim 5 wherein said second address is a real address.
 7. The system of claim 6 wherein said real address is associated with said virtual address.
 8. The system of claim 1 wherein a translation lookaside buffer includes said first, second, third and fourth circuitry.
 9. The system of claim 1 wherein said first and second circuitry are identical in design.
 10. The system of claim 9 wherein said first and second circuitry are cascadable.
 11. The system of claim 10 wherein said first and second circuitry are coupled together in a sequence.
 12. A method of operating a processing system, comprising the steps of:storing first translation information and selectively modifying a logic state of a first match line in response to a comparison between said first translation information and a first portion of a first address; storing second translation information and selectively modifying a logic state of a second match line in response to a comparison between said second translation information and a second portion of said first address; selectively modifying said logic state of said second match line in response to said logic state of said first match line; and selectively outputting a second address in response to said logic state of said second match line.
 13. The method of claim 12 wherein said first portion of said first address is available for said comparison before said second portion of said first address.
 14. The method of claim 12 and further comprising the step of translating at least a portion of an effective address into said second portion of said first address.
 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said second portion of said first address is available from said translating, and wherein said first portion of said first address is available from said effective address without translation.
 16. The method of claim 12 wherein said first address is a virtual address.
 17. The method of claim 16 wherein said second address is a real address.
 18. The method of claim 17 wherein said real address is associated with said virtual address. 